Vol. 5, No. 4
from Professor Cleary
Oops. There goes the black belt in Dinahís
future. Sheíll have to aspire to some other fashion statement, if she
hopes to impress her boss with her statistical knowledge. Itís clear that
she does not know why the variation in control limits occurs.
When Shewhart introduced X-bar and R charts, it was not because they represented the most statistically efficient approach, but rather because they are mathematically easier to create. When PQ Systemsí original SQCpack was created by my 15-year old son Sean in 1982, I felt as a statistician, that X-bar and S charts would soon have standard use, since computers can create them as easily as X-bar and R charts. What I did not take into consideration, however, was the power of tradition in determining usage. Grant and Leavenworth and other statisticians including myself continued to promote the application of X-bar and R charts, and as a result they have maintained their general usage in SPC. Indeed, the approach is robust enough to be useful to most applications, but in the meantime the potential offered by X-bar and S charts has been largely overlooked.
It is true that control limits on the S portion of X-bar and S charts vary. At least, sometimes they do, and sometimes they donít. So Dinah Thyrst was right in this respect. Understanding the reasons for the variation in control limits is an entirely new question to ponder, however. And next month, Dinah Thyrst will learn why the variation occurs. Stay tuned.
Copyright 2003 PQ Systems.
Please direct questions or problems regarding this web site to the Webmaster.